-Ranbir Singh
On every
single legal document, official government papers and above all in our Passports
under “Nationality” we write INDIAN in English and BHARTIYA in Hindi.
Nationality in fact is the identity. All over the World we are known as Indians
or Bhartiya, never as Hindu or Muslim or any thing else. HINDU we write as our religion. Which is wrong, but it has come to
stay because of the continuous wrong usage. I would like Adityanath to show his
passport in which what nationality he has mentioned, Indian or Hindutava. When
over a T.V. interview Adityanath, a hard core RSS pracharak , was asked as why
not Bhartiya instead of Hindu, he replied that Bhartiya is a geographical identity and Hindu is cultural identity.
This Indian
Tartuff does not know that the identity of every individual is at first made
from where he belongs to, and this is formed by geography. Culture of any
country of the World is built upon three tiers: Village—State—Nation. For
example I belong to Rajasthan, but my cultural roots are deeply rooted to the
soil of Shekhawati. My language, my speech, my character, my relation with
nature, my habits, food, way of thinking, behaving, my way of life, my
relations with the members of the other communities, participation in festivals
and rituals is all based upon the culture of Shekhawati. All cultural streams
from different directions meet and that becomes the composite culture of
Rajasthan. Similarly it happens on the national level where the cultural
streams from all directions meet and form the National culture. It is like Ganga , Jamuna and Saraswati meeting at Sangam and then
they become one.
The National
culture of India
is Ganga-Jamuni culture, where culture, religion, rituals, way of life of all
different communities merge into one. That is the culture of India or
Bharat. It is like the Bunyan tree, the branches and thousands of leaves are
the different cultures and the stem is the Nation. To cut it, uproot it or burn
it will be disastrous. We all will fall like autumn leaves.What is happening
was expected. I had written an article in July 2013 “Beware of the avalanche of
Fascism” warning the political parties, the intellectuals and the people of the
danger of fascisim.RSS which is dominating and ruling BJP had the agenda of Hindutatva
right from the beginning. Wearing the mask of development they very
successfully befooled the media and the people and now visiting different
countries in the company of the barons of capitalism, and silently allow and
encourage unwarranted rash utterances in favour of Hindutatva and Love Jihad, is
a political ploy and nothing else. If this tirade of Hindutatva is not stopped
in time it will tear apart the social fabric and destroy the Nation. We will be
faced with the ugly situation that came about at the end of Mahabharat. There
will be no victor and no loser. Love Jihad a new word which has been coined by
RSS and is being used as a political slogan is dangerous. Using the word Jihad
is totally against the ethos of Quran. RSS must spell out in clear words as to
what exactly it means by Love Jihad As a matter of fact Love Jihad as they mean
started from the family of RSS itself, when a muslim boy married a Hindu girl
belonging to the RSS family. He applied the Parkinson law very effectively, that,
”one cannot select the father, but he can definitely select the father-in-law”
To day he is a senior important member of RSS. There is another BJP muslim
leader who is married to a hindu girl. In Rajasthan there is a senior member of
RSS/BJP, an aspirant of a ministerial post, is married to muslim girl. Are
these not Love Jihad. Does Love Jihad only means when a Muslim marries a Hindu
girl, or it is for all other castes: If that is so then what will happen to
Simriti Irani’s marriage or many such other inter caste marriages. How is it
that the protagonists of RSS only see the danger from muslims and not from
others. What about saving the girls of all castes from the miseries of the
saffron clad demi-gods in their ashrams?
Conversions
over the centuries have been done because of political, social and economical
compulsions. The mighty Rajputs politically converted to Islam and were known
as Kayamkhani. They did convert but retained all the hindu traditions. Even so
that if a Chauhan had converted they will not marry in the other Kayamkhani
family who comes from Chahuan. They never married in any other muslim family
and even lived separately from the muslims. Will RSS wish to bring them once
again in the fold of Rajputs? Will they be accepted by the so called pure
Rajputs? Will the Rajputs give their daughters in marriage and accept their
daughters as daughter-in-laws? Will the Kayamkhanis wish to convert themselves
once again.? Similarly several Rajputs because of economical compulsions
converted themselves as Jats. I personaly believe that disgusted with the
feudal attitudes, and inhuman condition of the caste system which had become a
social evil, Rashabhdev and Gautam both Rajputs founded Jainism and Bhudhism.
Even later several Rajput princes took to Jainism. When Adityanath says that
they will convert Muslim girls to Hinduism they must think as to whether these
girls will be accepted in the Hindu homes? Will they find suitable husbands?
Once they are converted they will be abandoned by their parents. Once they
belonged to someone, now to none. Left in the wilderness as an easy prey for
human wolves. Has RSS and its spokesmen thought about the social problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment